Institute of Cybernetics at Tallinn University of Technology            RESEARCH OVERVIEW 1998
next top of this page previous

logo DEPARTMENT OF MECHANICS AND APPLIED MATHEMATICS


THE FRACTAL MODEL OF THE BLOOD-VESSEL SYSTEM

HEAD OF THE PROJECT Jaan KALDA, Ph.D., senior researcher

DESCRIPTION

The aim of the project is to elaborate a fractal model of the blood-vessel network as a whole, which would be in agreement with the current understanding of the processes governing the growth of the vascular network and with the empirical data.

Let us make a rough estimate of the similarity dimension of the blood-vessel tree. We can use the following empirical data: the length of the capillaries (i.e. the vessels of the last generation) lambda approx lambda0 approx 0.5, the length of the largest vessels (aorta) l0 approx 0.5 m and the total length of capillaries, L approx lambda0N approx 100,000 km. The total number of capillaries N can be expressed via the effective number of generations neff as N = 2neff. Being guided by the assumption of self-similarity, we can express the similarity factor a as a = ( lambda0/ l0)1/neff. Using the definition of the similarity dimension we can easily find

Ds = -1/ log2a approx 3.4(1)

The fractal model of the blood-vessel system with Ds ~ 3.4
The fractal model of the blood-vessel system with Ds approx3.4

The seemingly curious fact that the similarity dimension exceeds the topological dimension can be explained as follows. The Hausdorff-Besicovitch and box-counting dimensions of a space-filling fractal set DHB and Db are always equal to the topological dimension of the embedding space D. As for the similarity dimension, it is generally accepted that Ds coincides with the Hausdorff-Besicovitch dimension DHB. Thus it may seem that always Ds less or equal thanD. However, the equality Ds = DHB = Db can be applied only if all the dimensions are less than the dimension of the embedding space. Indeed, one can imagine that the fractal tree was originally embedded into a space of dimensionality Din> Ds and then projected into the space of dimensionality D < Ds. As a result of such a projection, the dimensions DHB and Ds become equal to the new value of D, whereas the similarity dimension will evidently remain unchanged.

ESF GRANTS

  1. No 902 (1996-1998)

PUBLICATIONS and TALKS at CONFERENCES


next top of this page previous 07/04/1998 webmaster

© Institute of Cybernetics, Akadeemia 21, Tallinn 12618, Estonia     Phone: (+372) 620 4150   Fax: (+372) 620 4151